The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has raised strong objections over an alleged courtroom incident involving Justice Mohammed Umar of the Federal High Court, Abuja, and lawyer Marshall Abubakar.
The incident reportedly occurred on March 16 during proceedings in a defamation case where Abubakar appeared as lead defence counsel to activist Omoyele Sowore.
According to reports, the trial judge ordered the lawyer to kneel for allegedly raising his voice while addressing the court on a hearing date, and also threatened to cite him for contempt.
Reacting in a statement, the NBA described the development as “deeply troubling,” warning that it has serious implications for the dignity of the legal profession and the sanctity of the courtroom.
“The courtroom is a temple of justice, governed by law, procedure, and decorum,” the association stated, stressing that judicial authority must be exercised within the limits of the law and established standards.
The NBA clarified that while courts have the power to punish for contempt, such powers must follow due process and respect the rights and dignity of all parties.
“A judge directing a legal practitioner or any person to kneel in court is not a recognised judicial sanction under our laws and does not align with expected standards of judicial conduct,” the statement said.
The association further emphasised that the integrity of the judiciary must be reflected not only in its rulings but also in how authority is exercised in court.
It advised that any act considered contemptuous should be handled strictly through lawful procedures.
“If a judge believes a person has acted contemptuously, the proper legal process must be followed,” the NBA added.
The NBA also reminded lawyers of their duty to maintain professionalism and decorum while advocating for clients.
NBA President Afam Osigwe (SAN) called for calm, urging that grievances arising from courtroom incidents be addressed through appropriate institutional channels.
He reaffirmed the association’s commitment to engaging relevant authorities where necessary to uphold the rule of law, professional standards, and judicial ethics.
